An open-label, non-randomized study of the pharmacokinetics of the nutritional supplement nicotinamide riboside (NR) and its effects on blood NAD+ levels in healthy volunteers
View on PubMed → | DOI | Publisher
Plain-language summary
Published 2017 in PLoS One, this work by Airhart SE and collaborators tackles a specific question within safety-focused NMN/NAD+ research.
Key findings reported by the authors
- Open-label, non-randomized human study of nicotinamide riboside (NR) pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers (PLoS One, 2017)
- Reported that oral NR raised blood NAD+ levels; note this studied NR, not NMN
- Open-label design without a control group limits the strength of the evidence
What this means for Malaysian buyers
For readers in Malaysia weighing whether to start or continue NMN supplementation, this paper sits at the moderate end of the evidence spectrum. Moderate-tier evidence usually means a small human trial or a well-designed mouse study; helpful for hypothesis-building but not for hard recommendations. Findings here are most directly relevant to safety decisions, with secondary relevance to compare. Our editorial methodology weights human placebo-controlled trials above mouse mechanistic work above review articles.
Where we cite this paper
- Compare NR Brands in Malaysia 2026: Buyer Checklist
- How NR Works: The Complete Guide to Nicotinamide Riboside Biology
- Is NR Halal? Complete Guide to JAKIM + NPRA Status
- Is NR Safe? Evidence-Based Review for Malaysians
- NR Dosage Guide for Malaysians: Complete Protocol
- NR vs NMN: Which NAD+ Precursor Should Malaysians Pick in 2026?